THE LIBERAL PIGS LOVE TO WALLER IN THE MUD

 

 

Once again the Liberal Pigs have gotten all dolled up and put on their lipstick so they can show up and crash our party at the GOP Convention in Tampa, Fl. And Matt Lauer is Boss Hog. On NBC’s Today Show on Tuesday, host Lauer interviewed Stephanie Cutter, President Barack Obama’s deputy campaign manager, and asked her to compare the President’s 2008 pledge to run a positive campaign to 2012’s negative campaign against Mitt Romney. Cutter replied that having a conversation about how Romney’s choices while at Bain Capital informs his ability to lead and the decisions he would make as president are critical for voters and legitimate areas of discussion. Lauer went on to ask set up question that would favor the Obama campaign, just as he does the same thing when he wants to try and smear the Romney campaign. Matt Lauer is a Liberal Pig liar and his poor reporting skills are solid proof of just how bias he and NBC are.  Now let’s look at another Liberal PIG who loves to Waller in the lying mud of the liberal press. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. IN A RELATED INTERVIEW: Stephanie Cutter Clarifies Her Comment For Wolf Blitzer: Romney Is A Liar, Not A Felon “If you think about what you’re candidate is out there on the campaign trail saying and compare it to what he was saying as a candidate four years ago about changing the atmosphere in Washington and bringing hope to people who are having a difficult time finding hope, are you proud of the message he is out there delivering,” asked Lauer. Cutter replied that Obama was talking about moving Washington forward “do what we need to do for a strong middle class and sustained economic growth.” “As of late it’s been an awful lot about Mitt Romney and his offshore accounts and his time at Bain,” Lauer interjected. “The President talked yesterday about the need to bring jobs back to American stead of outsourcing them overseas,” said Cutter.

“That’s a legitimate discussion to have in this campaign.” Lauer asked if Cutter would characterize the past week of Obama’s campaign as positive or negative. “I think the President is playing out the choice,” Cutter replied. “Elections are about choices.” Lauer then highlighted Obama’s words from 2008 when he said, “What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics… that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge but enemies to demonize.” Lauer also quoted Obama in 2008 accepting the Democratic Party’s nomination for president when he said, “If you don’t have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from.” “You don’t feel that President Obama in the last week or so has done just that,” Lauer asked. Now lets stop right here. Notice how Matt is defending Obama. Listen to her answer, Lauer is setting her up to smear Romney, and he does this in every interview he does. This is called ‘Controlled Manipulation ‘and Matt Lauer is a “Master Manipulator”. What business of Matt Lauer’s is it how Mitt Romney spends his money or where he makes his investments, Un like Lauer, Mitt Romney has earned every dime he has ever made. Listen to Cutters perfect liberal pig answer that makes Lauer Happy, “Matt, I think that in talking about Mitt Romney’s record and, you know, we’re happy to talk about the President’s record. The President is out there every single day doing that. But if we’re talking about Mitt Romney’s record, that’s a legitimate discussion.” Cutter said that Romney’s taxes and his tenure at Bain are at the heart of Romney’s claim to the presidency but the gap in the record at Bain and his offshore accounts shed doubt on his ability to lead. “Where Romney invests his money in a Swiss bank account, in offshore tax havens, in shell corporations in Bermuda will affect the types of decisions he makes,” Cutter concluded. Did you catch Chris Christie’s message on Tuesday night at the GOP Convention? Chris Christie rallied the GOP in convention keynote with tough-love 'truth-telling' message. How ever Liberal Democrat Journalist and Super Pig Matt Lauer who did his dead level best to discredit Christie as he opened the Today’s Show on Wednesday morning in hoping to make Governor Christies key note address that gave some fresh air and new hope to our nation, also known as the republican and conservative and Tea party voters look to be a self absorbed speech and that it lacked sincerity and credibility.

However, Chris Christie brought the tough love, the swagger, the fight and even the Boss to Tampa Tuesday night. The straight-talking New Jersey governor used his highly anticipated convention keynote to strike a match under the Republican Party faithful and effectively give them their marching orders going into November. Making the case in no uncertain terms for the Romney ticket, Christie charged conservatives with leading a “new era of truth-telling” calling this the only way to revive a country “paralyzed” by feckless leadership. “We ended an era of absentee leadership without purpose or principle in New Jersey,” Christie said, relating his own experiences fighting the teachers unions and other interests in the Garden State.” It is time to end this era of absentee leadership in the Oval Office and send real leaders back to the White House. “America needs Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, and we need them right now,” Christie declared. With much riding on the speech, Christie delivered a rousing address that repeatedly brought the crowd to its feet. Christie also set the stage for vice presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan, who is scheduled to speak Wednesday. After it was over, former New Jersey Gov. Tom Kean told Fox News the governor had just “set the tone” for the campaign. “Chris Christie supplied the thrust and the fuel for the rocket to take off,” Kean said. Christie was as tough on Obama as he was supportive of Mitt Romney, ratcheting up the convention tone as the president sets out on a campaign swing of his own this week. Christie claimed “doubt and fear” have seized a country that four years ago put its stock in hope and change. Throughout, the governor called on Republicans to do what he claims Democrats have not, and start telling the” hard truths” about what needs to be done to reduce entitlements, reduce the size of government and ultimately bring down the debt. Teeing up his address, Christie recalled the advice of his late mother, whom he said taught him to” speak from the heart” and always choose respect over love. “She told me there would be times in your life when you have to choose between being loved and being respected. She said to always pick being respected. She told me that love without respect was always fleeting.” He added: “I believe we have become paralyzed, paralyzed by our desire to be loved.” Christie said leaders chronically opt to do what is popular, “but tonight I say enough.” Tonight,” he said, “we’re gonna choose respect over love.” The governor said Romney will” tell us the truth” and “lead with conviction” and that, in the end, the country will thrive “in a second American century.” “If you’re willing to hear the truth … about the hard road ahead, and the rewards for America that truth will bear, I’m here to begin with you this new era of truth-telling,” Christie said. The governor flavored his speech with his own New Jersey upbringing, telling about how his dad put himself through Rutgers while his “tough-as-nails” mother raised him. “She spoke the truth bluntly, directly and without much varnish. I am her son,” Christie said, before making a passing reference to his lifelong love of Bruce Springsteen. “I was her son as I listened to ‘Darkness on the Edge of Town’ with my high school friends on the Jersey Shore,” Christie said. Christie’s speech was closely watched, as Republicans were depending on him to not only energize a convention delayed and overshadowed by Hurricane Isaac, but to make the case to Republicans, Democrats and independents -- for Mitt Romney. Romney’s wife, Ann, offered the personal touch, telling stories about the newly anointed GOP nominee that only she would know in an earlier address. But it was Christie’s job to bring the rhetorical firepower and energize a party that for months –years, really – has been divided over Romney’s bid for the presidency. Christie sought to leave no doubt that now is the time for Republicans to rally around that man. And the audience responded, interrupting the speech repeatedly with applause. Utah delegate Bianca Lisonbee told FoxNews.com she thought Christie delivered. "He hit it out of the park. He hit the nail on the head,” she said. “Americans are hungry for people who will tell it like it is. They need someone who will tell them not what they want to hear, but what they need to hear. That is Chris Christie." Colorado alternate delegate Lloyd Garcia said he thought Christie dished “some hard truths.” I’m always excited to hear him speak,” he said. “I wish he were running for president this time around.” For Christie himself, the address was indeed a chance to burnish his national stage presence, perhaps in preparation for a presidential run sometime in the future. The governor was eyed as a possible Romney running mate this year, but Christie insisted all along he wasn’t interested in leaving Trenton right this moment.

Let’s look a little closer at “Boss Hog”, or “Matt Lauer” I am sure he feels that he has the Power of “Okra Winbag”, or “Oprah Winfrey”? However he is no-where close to Oprah, she pays more in her capital gains tax each month, then his 21.5 Million a year that the suckers at NBC pay his lying, cheating ass. However, I have to credit him, he is a terrible journalist, he is not attractive at all, he is short, losing his hair and just plain ugly, and yet he gets the big paycheck? Is NBC that desperate to a Kiss Ass Liberal like Lauer that they will actually pay this wanna be Gangsta 21.5 million a year? What a joke! This guy is worthless, and the Liberals love him? He has no character, no class and most of all he has no idea what loyalty is. This guy gets paid to smear good people in his pig pin.

Recently Boos Hog opened the today show like this, the day after Ann Curry had been fired as co-host all because Matt Lauer got here kicked off the show and even Al Roker said live on are that Lauer threw Curry under the bus. Laure was all happy and glee, as he said; It’s a new day at “Today” and Matt Lauer looked a little too happy to be rid of former co-host Ann Curry. A beaming Lauer formally introduced Savannah Guthrie as Curry’s replacement at the stroke of 7 a.m. today, “And good morning, welcome to 'Today' on a Monday morning and it truly is a new day around here,” the veteran morning anchor said.” It truly is a new day around here"- Matt Lauer “I’m Matt Lauer and I’m pleased to be sharing this new day with Savannah Guthrie who after several years of playing a great role on this program takes a step forward this morning and joins us as co-anchor of `Today.’ How’s it feel? “The pretty new co-host Guthrie chirped: “Great good morning it’s an honor to be here.” The smiling faces belied the backstage drama that’s plagued 30 Rock this summer. NBC suits brutally dumped Curry, making her the scapegoat for declining ratings. Lauer, who reportedly wanted Curry out, was practically spiking the football this morning in welcoming his new anchor-desk partner. “Well it’s nice to be here because I get to be the first to officially say welcome to `Today’. We are thrilled to have you,” Lauer said. My point is this, the liberals love to0 attack the Conservatives. You would think that the Liberal Democrats would be the ones who have a handle on the American economy, however the statistics prove different, it the Republican governors that really do better on the economy. One weird theme in Tuesday night’s Republican National Convention speeches was GOP governors like John Kasich (Ohio) or Mary Fallin (Okla.) bragging about how great their economies are doing. “When we came into office we were 48th in job creation,” Kasich said. “You know we’re we are today? We’re fourth in America fourth in job creation and number one in the Midwest.” This is supposed to signal the success of Republican policies, but is sort of off-message at an event dedicated to emphasizing the dismal state of the economy after Obama’s first term in office. So can those two claims be squared with each other? Are states with Republican governors really doing better? It’s tough to say. On the one hand, there’s very little good data on the latest crop of GOP governors, given that they were only elected in early 2011. One can look at monthly unemployment data in the following chart.

 

So unemployment rates in Republican-governed states was ever-so-slightly higher and then the two converged as the recovery proceeded. But the differences here are tiny. At its height, the gap between the two groups was 0.22 percentage points, which turned into a 0.082 higher rate in Democratic states in April. That’s a swing of 0.32 percentage points in favor of Republican states. That’s not much at all, especially considering all the regional factors that likely played a much larger role. It’s also not especially meaningful given that unemployment rates at the state level are highly subject to swings due to population changes. If unemployed people move to a state in search of work, its labor force grows and adds an unemployed person, so the unemployment rate grows. But if anything that reflects economic health in that state. So let’s look just at the number of works on non farm payrolls in each state, and how that changed from month to month. Did payrolls grow faster in Republican-governed states? Well, no, as the chart below shows. Unfortunately there’s not a lot of other data available in regular intervals at the state level. Personal income growth is reported quarterly. It also shows no real difference between Democratic-governed states. The Democrats are failing.  Now if we look at “Governor Romney now owns the Republican, Ryan budget that puts millionaires ahead of Medicare and the middle class,” House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California recently snapped.“By picking Representative Paul Ryan, Governor Romney has doubled down on his commitment to gut Social Security and end Medicare as we know it,” Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada snarled. Pelosi and Reid know better. Presumptive GOP running mate Paul Ryan’s Medicare reform proposal is as extreme as the health plan available to every member of Congress. Ryan envisions average seniors enjoying Capitol Hill-style medical options. This, itself, would be a choice. Seniors who oppose choice in health coverage will be 100 percent welcome to remain within traditional Medicare. Ryan’s “far-Right” Medicare reform is co-sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon liberal Democrat. (2010 Americans for Democratic Action rating: 100 percent) Unlike most Democrats, Wyden understands that if Medicare traverses today’s path, by 2024, it will tumble into a canyon. As he and Ryan (2010 ADA rating: 0 percent) unveiled their legislation last December, Wyden said: “Paul has also long-shared my view that the best way to hold down health costs is to give all Americans the ability to hire and fire their insurance company.” Wyden/Ryan would do just that, although no time soon. “Americans currently over the age of 55 would see no changes to the structure of their benefits,” their bill summary states. “Starting in 2022, Medicare would begin offering seniors a choice among Medicare-approved private plans competing alongside a traditional Medicare plan.” So, Democratic horror stories about Republicans catapulting today’s seniors from cliffs prove to be lies. If the GOP ticket wins and enacts Wyden/Ryan, Medicare benefits will not change for a decade. If Romney and Ryan lose, however, seniors soon will feel the pain of President Barack Obama’s diversion of $716 billion from Medicare into Obamacare. Ten years hence, Wyden/Ryan would let Medicare recipients request “premium support” payments. As Wyden and Ryan argue, “that would empower seniors to choose either a traditional Medicare plan or a Medicare-approved private plan.” “Premium support” is a Dullsville name for a dazzling idea.

 

It should be rechristened Insurance Assistance unexciting, but fathomable, Kemp Grants echoing collegiate Pell Grants, but honoring Ryan’s late mentor, former New York GOP Congressman Jack Kemp, Personal Health Grants as columnist Quin Hillyer suggests, or Medi-Choice as the True-Speak Institute’s Jim Guirard advises. These payments would offer “more help for those who need it” and “less help for those who don’t,” Wyden and Ryan continue. “Wealthier seniors who need help least would see their assistance reduced.” Democrats who hate rich people should love how Wyden/Ryan pinpoints benefits on poorer Americans Seniors would use these optional payments to purchase medical plans that make them happy. Thus, Wyden/Ryan mirrors the way federal legislators buy health insurance. As FactCheck.org’s Brooks Jackson notes, “House and Senate members are allowed to purchase private health insurance offered through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, which covers more than 8 million other federal employees, retirees and their families.” “The FEHBP offers about 300 different private health care plans,” Jackson writes, “including five government-wide, fee-for-service plans and many regional health maintenance organization (HMO) plans...” While this huge number includes all policies, nationwide, “an enrollee’s choice is between 5 and 15 options,” the Congressional Research Service reports. As FactCheck.org further details, “All plans cover hospital, surgical and physician services, and mental health services, prescription drugs and ‘catastrophic’ coverage against very large medical expenses ... There are no exclusions for preexisting conditions.” Participants may change plans during annual open-season periods. Also, the government pays 72 percent of the average worker’s premium, and a maximum of 75 percent. Democrats cannot explain why Medicare recipients need to become congressmen to enjoy such choices in health coverage. If Ryan-Care, in essence, is good enough for senior citizens like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, it’s good enough for any senior who wants it after 2022. So with the track record of this White House administration that is ran by President Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and the biggest Liberal Monster of the all Nancy Pelosi.

 

Tea Party Nation founder Judson Phillips, speaking at yesterday’s Unity Rally 2012 in Tampa ahead of the Republican National Convention, claimed that President Obama and Congressional Democrats are out to destroy the country. Phillips told the crowd that Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are socialists who support a system that causes “poverty, tyranny and occasionally mass murder:” This nation has done more good for more people than any other nation in the world. And this is the nation that Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi want to diminish and destroy. Today, freedom and liberty stand in opposition to socialism. You know the primary products of the system that Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi love so well are poverty, tyranny and occasionally mass murder. These are the fruits of socialism, and to the socialists we have simply one word, "no!" It time for the liberals to get a very clear understanding from the conservatives, the days of just sitting back and allowing the Liberals and the Gays to bully the conservatives is over, we are no longer going to go quietly into that dark night of socialist tyranny. We have voices to, and these Liberal Pigs will need to find a new muddy pig pin to Waller in ~ Donnie Bolena